Analysis of Various Topologies and Control Circuit used in Single Phase EV Charger

Abstract

In remote electric vehicle charging frameworks utilizing inductive power transfer (IPT), power electronic converters assume a basic part in decreasing size and cost, as well as boosting the proficiency of the whole framework. As of late, analysts have led huge examination studies to work on the exhibition of power transformation frameworks, including power converter topologies and control plans. Incorporated On-Board Battery Chargers (OBC) have been acquainted as ideal arrangement with increase of electric vehicle (EV) market penetration and limit the general expense of EVs. OBCs are by and large arranged into triphasic and monophasic types with unidirectional or bidirectional power stream. Existing electric vehicle (EV) chargers utilize a hard-core non-linear diode bridge-rectifier (BR) to exploit the DC volt at the contribution of the DC converter and acquaint quality of the power is a counted as a problem with the AC input. These problems insist improvement in Power Quality for existing battery charger for this purpose the bridgeless Cuk Converter is used with the flyback converter. Cuk Converter used single diode and switch and provide additional advantage like reduction in the switch volt-stress and higher efficiency equated to the other conventional bridgeless (BL) converters. Similarly, bridgeless isolated Zeta-Luo converter with PF correction is also used. The Zeta and Luo is functioned for the half cycle of the supply individually and give the benefits of the both topologies. In this paper BL Zeta, BL Cuk, BL Buck-Boost, BL Luo, BL Single Ended Primary Inductance Converter (BL SPIC), and Canonical Switched Cell (CSC) converters are reviewed.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

As indicated by the International Energy Outlook Report, the vehicle area will expand its portion of complete world oil utilization to 55% by 2030 [1]. In this manner, advances connected with the decrease of oil utilization are one of the best difficulties of flow auto research. As of late, elective advances have started to exhibit their market entrance through the presentation of module mixture EVs or PHEVs and all the types of EVs or BEVs [2-6].

In PHEVs and EVs, a 3kW~6kW single-stage on-board charger is generally introduced, so the powerful footing battery can be charged through an outlet [2,3]. The notable geography of an OBC is the two-level assembly. A front-end level, typically a lift converter, is taken on to perform PF remedy to diminish line losses and AC limit [4]. A subsequent stage, normally a high-effectiveness disconnected DC converter, is taken on to satisfy wellbeing guidelines and control charging current [5]. The output power is steady in a 2-level battery charger because of the charging current (CC) is typically a consistent direct current (DC). As we all know that the sinusoidal power is produced by the AC, a DC connect capacitor, going in esteem from a couple hundred to 2 or 3μF, is required as energy cushion [6,7]. The DC connect capacitor is generally a short life electrolytic capacitor, which isn't best for company flitted charger whereas a film capacitor (FC) is a decent solution. Be that as it may, for the worth expected in a conventional two-level charger and FC is excessively costly. It is essential to lessen the worth of the capacitor, so a FC can be utilized without expanding the expense and size.

Incorporated chargers or rectifiers transform AC mains voltage to DC and normally have single directional power. Utilizing further developed geography and regulator than customary strategies accessible available, the coordinated charger can likewise give power quality capabilities like receptive power remuneration (inductive or capacitive), voltage guideline, consonant separating, and power factor rectification (PFR). [8,9].

Rapid battery charging can be accomplished by the utilization either via dc or three-level charging, as portrayed in following table which likewise depict the power level and charging time. Present literature has presented numerous geographies for On-Board Charger that proposition rapid charging of the battery by essentially associating the vehicle to 3-? supply.

Table 1. Microgrid with Distributed Sources and Loads [10]

To give maximum power quality (PQ) with unity PF procedure on the source side, upgraded PQ converters are utilized among the bridge rectifier based on diodes and the yield capacitor. Two-level EV chargers enjoy all the types of benefits of maximum unwavering quality, high DC interface voltage regulation (VR), and DC capacitor size contrasted with single-level EV chargers. A customary lift power factor rectification (PFR) converter is suggested to achieve the UPF. Be that as it may, because of the enormous variety in DC voltage, a buck-boost converter is mostly preferred over boost converter [11].

Fig. 1 demonstrations the essential grouping of two-directional OBCs, including single-level and 2-level OBCs which are denoted by the single-level OBCs which are rated from 0 to 7000W and 3-level OBCs are rated from 7000W to 22000W. The time used in charging the EV is contrarywise to the power levels of the related converters. Because of more limited charging time necessities, higher power bi-directional OBCs are normally taken into the pictures in future researches. Most single-level topologies can arrive at upto 7000W, while high strain breakers should be avoided. The 3-level OBCs topologies can arrive at up to 22000W. According to the charging time the particular topology could be chosen.

II. DIFFERENT BRIDGELESS CHARGER

A significant number of these buck-boost based setups give extra compensations of less transmission losses in the PFR stage with BL innovations. This multitude of arrangements like Zeta Converter (ZC), Cuk Converter (CKC), SEPIC, and CSC converter utilize just two-line diodes. In this way, the basic uses of the switches are enhanced and the conduction loss of diode is diminished contrasted with Diode Bridge Rectifier-based better PQ converters. Numerous BLPFC converters in light of Zeta [14], Cuk [12] and SEPIC [13] designs are introduced in the literature.

The disservice of the beating yield current and the enormous size of the channels to limit output load ripple in the detached single-level SEPIC converter make it unsatisfactory for the PF pre-set charger. The CKC is extremely famous in this reach in light of the fact that decreased wave is accomplished on both information and result.

Notwithstanding, it needs a capacitor in series with rms current to work at an expanded power. Both the ZC and LC offers astounding PQ enhancement attributes, great less load guideline and the benefit of low load current. Additionally, to develop more effectiveness of the charger, numerous BLPFC converter geographies with disconnection are accounted. Now, it diminishes losses which are related to the semiconductors. The circuit design of regular separated ZC and LC is showed in Figs. 2 (a) and (b). Consequently, in view of the DBR-based topologies referenced over an EV charger with a coordinated BL separated Zeta-Luo setup [15], as displayed in Fig. 2 (c).

CKC is the utmost suggested topology for PQ enhancement in EV battery chargers in light of the fact that the ripple is coming up short on input and output. To diminish the weight on the regular bridgeless Cuk converter, many delicate exchanging techniques are accounted for in the writing. For the PFC in the EV chargers we need extra attractive parts and capacitors.

Hence, to conquer the above disadvantages in the ordinary geography, a better BL CKC with decreased parts sum and diminished exchanging volt requirement is introduced. This bridgeless CKC is utilized for EV battery charger for updated PQ which utilizes the flyback converter. This bridgeless Cuk PFC converter involves a single diode for bridgeless activity as showed in next figure.

III. WORKING OF BRIDGELESS CHARGER IN DIFFERENT MODES

The battery of the electrical vehicle is distinguished in steady current and consistent voltage modes when proportional-integral (PI) regulator is used. This technology of BL converter intended to work freely throughout positive and negative power cycles in ZC or LC mode.

As per the figure 2(c) demonstrated, the arrangement of bridgeless-segregated ZL converter-based vehicle charger, working on distinct half-cycles, freely. The BL converter activity is completed in irregular method of activity to give pre-guideline of PF at constant voltage and in many variable mains voltages. During ZC activity, the switch S1, transformer polarizing inductor Lm1, middle capacitor C1, and diode D01 direct during the positive portion of the stockpile cycle. In any case, the activity of the LC through the negative portion of the stock is helped by the switch S2 which is based on semiconductor, the polarizing inductance of the transformer Lm2, the middle of the road capacitor C2 and the result diode D02. The hypothetical examination during the activity in consistent condition of this detached converter BL is itemized beneath.

Three unique methods of activity and the related key activity of this segregated converter are displayed beneath, in ZC mode and LC modes for the comparing power parts. Mode-I [t0-t1]: During this mode, gate pulse if given at the instant that is t0 to the switch s1. The present inductor Lm1 shows the charging current due to the line diode (Dp) provide the path to inductor for storing the energy. The voltage across the power capacitor C1 starts to diminish as the ongoing invented a way through the result inductor L01 on the optional side, as displayed in Fig. 4 (a)-1. During this span the diode D01 is found in the off state. When the switch S1is in Off state the mode t1 is closed.

Mode II [t1-t2]: During this span, switch S1 switches off and diode D01 begins directing. The polarizing inductor Lm1 discharges the put away energy through the capacitor C1 to the result diode D01 and the optional twisting of the transformer. When the battery current is constant during the constant current mode the output DC connect capacitor begins to charge through the L0 inductor.

Mode-III [t2-t3]: During this span, switch S1 stays in Off state and the drive is used in the direct current mode. As demonstrated in the fig 4(a)-3 and 5 the amount of the flows through the charging inductor Lm1 and the result inductor L0 prompts zero current through diode D01. In the mode-III the capacitor Cdc keeps on and providing charging current to the battery.

Comparative groupings of activity are seen in LC mode during the half cycle when counted as negative, as displayed in Fig. 4(b) 1’, 2’ & 3’. The main distinction is that the DCM activity in the Luo converter is related to zero current in the polarizing inductor. Fig. 5 shows the related waveforms of various exchanging parts during an exchanging cycle.

A LC [16], is the maximum utilized dc power, change due to having better VR over a wide info voltage range and higher productivity at light load condition [17]. An examination investigation of LC with other single stage spanned and BLPFC converters in the writing, is displayed in next table that is Table-II. Series LC for dc change with the voltage-lift component, for example, re-lift, ultra-lift and super-lift, are accounted [18]-[20]. It is found in Table-II that LC display fantastic power quality execution with voltage is higher as much as can and move gain, less voltage and current wave. Nonetheless, the capability of LC with BL setup actually should be investigated. A changed BLLuo converter with positive result is planned and examined by Gnanavadivel et.al [21] yet with huge number of parts and an info channel.

If one rate from 1 to 3 so the various terms of dual stage converter, Buck Converter and Boost converter is demonstrated in fig. 6 and Table 2 shows the compassion between various single phase power factor correction converters on the basis of literature review. Similarly, table 3 indicates the comparison of inverter topologies regarding the requirement of the components.

To acquire the error signal (Eg) the gain voltage ???????? is contrasted with the deliberate battery voltage (????????). And to produce the current which is reference current Ib* the error signal is fed back to the input which is contrasted with the deliberate battery current ???????? to get the error signal expected for the inward PID regulator. A step signal which is sawtooth in the shape is needed to drive the switch S1 and to get a modulated width of pulse. To work in PWM mode the switch S1 is selected by the selector and in this situation the switches ????2 and ????3 are in OFF mode. The second technique where the switch S2 is ON and the switch S3 is in Off mode and the switch S1 is operate in PWM mode. The fig 7(c) demonstrated the control technique for propulsion mode. Although the propulsion mode is almost similar in buck mode and in boost mode. The basic difference in between both these technique is the state of switch in buck mode that is switch ????2 is in On state where switch ????1 and ????3 in Off state.

Conclusion

The size of the converter is depended on the use of number of components in the converter. So, to reduce the size of the inverter one has to use the smaller number of components and the disposal of information channel as well as plan of converter in DCM. To charge the battery on the regular constant voltage and current the flyback dc converter is used with the BL converter. To produce the better output from the BL converter one has to regulate the PQ attributes which is proficient to mitigate PQ issues present in the regular EV charger. The better PQ implementation of charger resulted wide info voltage variety range with decreased mains current THD as low as 1.8% to 2%. Also, EV charger has accomplished during fire over-top extensive variety. Consequently, this EV charging arrangement apparently is the most prescribed and worked on choice to supplant the customary chargers used in the EVs.

References

[1] \"International Energy Outlook 2009,\" Energy Information Administration (EIA), Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, OE/EIA-0484(2009), May 2009. [2] Yilmaz, Murat, and P. Krein. \"Review of charging power levels and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles and commentary on unidirectional charging.\" In IEEE international electrical vehicle conference. 2012. [3] Gautam, Deepak S., Fariborz Musavi, Murray Edington, Wilson Eberle, and William G. Dunford. \"An automotive onboard 3.3-kW battery charger for PHEV application.\" IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 61, no. 8 (2012): 3466-3474. [4] Musavi, Fariborz, Wilson Eberle, and William G. Dunford. \"A high-performance single-phase bridgeless interleaved PFC converter for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery chargers.\" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 47, no. 4 (2011): 1833-1843. [5] Musavi, Fariborz, Marian Craciun, Murray Edington, Wilson Eberle, and William G. Dunford. \"Practical design considerations for a LLC multi-resonant DC-DC converter in battery charging applications.\" In 2012 Twenty-Seventh Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 2596-2602. IEEE, 2012. [6] Khaligh, Alireza, and Serkan Dusmez. \"Comprehensive topological analysis of conductive and inductive charging solutions for plug-in electric vehicles.\" IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 61, no. 8 (2012): 3475-3489. [7] Musavi, Fariborz, Murray Edington, Wilson Eberle, and William G. Dunford. \"Evaluation and efficiency comparison of front-end AC-DC plug-in hybrid charger topologies.\" IEEE Transactions on Smart grid 3, no. 1 (2011): 413-421. [8] Pinto, J. G., Vítor Monteiro, Henrique Gonçalves, and João Luiz Afonso. \"Onboard reconfigurable battery charger for electric vehicles with traction-to-auxiliary mode.\" IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology 63, no. 3 (2013): 1104-1116. [9] Kisacikoglu, Mithat C., Burak Ozpineci, and Leon M. Tolbert. \"EV/PHEV bidirectional charger assessment for V2G reactive power operation.\" IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 28, no. 12 (2013): 5717-5727. [10] Yilmaz, Murat, and Philip T. Krein. \"Review of battery charger topologies, charging power levels, and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles.\" IEEE transactions on Power Electronics 28, no. 5 (2012): 2151-2169. [11] Siu, Ken King Man, and Carl Ngai Man Ho. \"Manitoba rectifier—Bridgeless buck–boost PFC.\" IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 35, no. 1 (2019): 403-414. [12] Fardoun, Abbas A., Esam H. Ismail, Ahmad J. Sabzali, and Mustafa A. Al-Saffar. \"New efficient bridgeless Cuk rectifiers for PFC applications.\" IEEE transactions on power electronics 27, no. 7 (2012): 3292-3301. [13] Singh, Shikha, Bhim Singh, G. Bhuvaneswari, and Vashist Bist. \"A power quality improved bridgeless converter-based computer power supply.\" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 52, no. 5 (2016): 4385-4394. [14] Narula, Swati, Bhim Singh, and G. Bhuvaneswari. \"PFC bridgeless converter for welding power supply with improved power quality.\" In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2014. [15] Kushwaha, Radha, and Bhim Singh. \"Bridgeless isolated Zeta–Luo converter-based EV charger with PF preregulation.\" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 57, no. 1 (2020): 628-636. [16] Luo, Fang Lin. \"Positive output Luo converters: voltage lift technique.\" IEE proceedings-electric power applications 146, no. 4 (1999): 415-432 [17] He, Yi, and Fang Lin Luo. \"Analysis of Luo converters with voltage-lift circuit.\" IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications 152, no. 5 (2005): 1239-1252. [18] Luo, F. Lin. \"Re-lift converter: design, test, simulation and stability analysis.\" IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications 145, no. 4 (1998): 315-325. [19] Luo, F. L., and Hong Ye. \"Ultra-lift Luo-converter.\" IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications 152, no. 1 (2005): 27-32. [20] Luo, Fang Lin, and Hong Ye. \"Negative output super-lift converters.\" IEEE Transactions on power electronics 18, no. 5 (2003): 1113-1121. [21] Gnanavadivel, J., P. Yogalakshmi, Natarajan Senthil Kumar, and K. S. Krishna Veni. \"Design and development of single-phase AC–DC discontinuous conduction mode modified bridgeless positive output Luo converter for power quality improvement.\" IET Power Electronics 12, no. 11 (2019): 2722-2730. [22] Kushwaha, Radha, and Bhim Singh. \"An improved battery charger for electric vehicle with high power factor.\" In 2018 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), pp. 1-8. IEEE, 2018. [23] Sabzali, Ahmad J., Esam H. Ismail, Mustafa A. Al-Saffar, and Abbas A. Fardoun. \"New bridgeless DCM Sepic and Cuk PFC rectifiers with low conduction and switching losses.\" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 47, no. 2 (2011): 873-881. [24] Jha, Aman, and Bhim Singh. \"Bridgeless ZETA PFC converter for low voltage high current LED driver.\" In 2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA), pp. 539-544. IEEE, 2017. [25] Singh, Bhim, and Radha Kushwaha. \"A high-power quality battery charger for light electric vehicle based on improved BL cuk converter with low component count.\" In 2020 IEEE 9th Power India International Conference (PIICON), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2020. [26] Singh, Bhim, Brij N. Singh, Ambrish Chandra, Kamal Al-Haddad, Ashish Pandey, and Dwarka P. Kothari. \"A review of single-phase improved power quality AC-DC converters.\" IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics 50, no. 5 (2003): 962-981. [27] Yuan, Jiaqi, Lea Dorn-Gomba, Alan Dorneles Callegaro, John Reimers, and Ali Emadi. \"A review of bidirectional on-board chargers for electric vehicles.\" IEEE Access 9 (2021): 51501-51518, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069448, VOLUME 9, 2021 [28] Reddy, Kondreddy Sreekanth, and Sreenivasappa B. Veeranna. \"Single phase multifunctional integrated converter for electric vehicles.\" Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 24, no. 3 (2021): 1342-1353. Vol. 24, No. 3, December 2021 [29] Zhang, Gongcheng, Hongjun Qu, Guojun Chen, Chong Zhao, Fenglian Zhang, Haizhang Yang, Zhao Zhao, and Ming Ma. \"Giant discoveries of oil and gas fields in global deepwaters in the past 40 years and the prospect of exploration.\" Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience 4, no. 1 (2019): 1-28. [30] Hassan, Mudasser, Zahir Javed Paracha, Hammad Armghan, Naghmash Ali, Hafiz Ahsan Said, Umar Farooq, Ammar Afzal, and Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan. \"Lyapunov based adaptive controller for power converters used in hybrid energy storage systems.\" Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 42 (2020): 100853. [31] Pramanik, Ranjan, and B. B. Pati. \"Modelling and control of a non-isolated half-bridge bidirectional DC-DC converter with an energy management topology applicable with EV/HEV.\" Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences (2021). [32] Kondreddy, Sreekanth Reddy, and B. Veeranna Sreenivasappa. \"Integrated buck and boost converter for a universal battery charger of an Electric Vehicle.\" In E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 309. EDP Sciences, 2021. [33] Colak, Kerim, Mariusz Bojarski, Erdem Asa, and Dariusz Czarkowski. \"A constant resistance analysis and control of cascaded buck and boost converter for wireless EV chargers.\" In 2015 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 3157-3161. IEEE, 2015. [34] Huynh, Phuoc Sang, Deepak Ronanki, Deepa Vincent, and Sheldon S. Williamson. \"Overview and comparative assessment of single-phase power converter topologies of inductive wireless charging systems.\" Energies 13, no. 9 (2020): 2150. [35] Dutta, Sukanya, Sivanagaraju Gangavarapu, Akshay Kumar Rathore, Rajeev Kumar Singh, Santanu K. Mishra, and Vinod Khadkikar. \"Novel Single-Phase Cuk-Derived Bridgeless PFC Converter for On-Board EV Charger With Reduced Number of Components.\" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 58, no. 3 (2022): 3999-4010 [36] Ramanathan, G., C. Bharatiraja, and Sivaprasad Athikkal. \"Design and Implementation of Modified Z-Source Inverter for Multi-Port Electric Vehicle Charger.\" In 2022 Second International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies (ICPC2T), pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2022. [37] Sreeram, K., Sreehari Surendran, and P. K. Preetha. \"A Review on Single-Phase Integrated Battery Chargers for Electric Vehicles.\" Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (ICTCS 2021) (2023): 751-765. [38] Sharma, Anurag, and Rajesh Gupta. \"Bridgeless single stage AC/DC converter with power factor correction.\" Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 11, no. 5 (2022). [39] R. Kaushik, S. Soni, A. Swami, C. Arora, N. Kumari and R. Prajapati, \"Sustainability of Electric Vehicle in India,\" 2022 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), 2022, pp. 664-667, doi: 10.1109/ICICT54344.2022.9850638.

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ashish Tripathi, Shimi Sudha Letha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.